Organizational Resolutions, Letters and Statements

Lea esta página en español

If you really want to influence politics, think bigger than just you!

Congress perks up and listens when groups of citizens come together and confront them with the position of the organization as a whole. Such a resolution signed by an organization, whether it is a local or national association, holds much more weight than a phone call or letter from an individual constituent. Plus, resolutions are news -- and we always need more news stories about opposition to unfair trade agreements.

With the fight over the U.S.-Peru and U.S.-Colombia "free trade" agreements upon us, now is the time to work on a resolution!

How does it work? Look at the CAFTA fight for inspiration

During the debate about the U.S.-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), the Bush administration tried to argue that being anti-CAFTA was "anti-Hispanic" -- despite the fact that the agreement would be beneficial to big U.S. Corporations, but harmful to workers both in Central America and the United States. Obviously, the argument didn't hold water, but without resolutions and letters from national organizations like the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Central American Immigrant Groups like the Salvadoran American National Network (SANN), and a myriad of Central American hometown associations, that might have been harder to prove.

Read LULAC's 2004 resolution against CAFTA
Read LULAC's press release about their resolution
Read the Boston Globe article about LULAC's resolution

If your organization does not use a resolution process, you can also just put together a letter to your member of congress -- or to all members of congress about trade issues. Below is an example from Salvadoran hometown associations during the CAFTA fight:

Read the letter from the Salvadoran Hometown Association to Congressman Jim Moran (D-MD)

Just preparing a statement from your organization is equally helpful.

Read the statement from North Carolina Latino organizations about CAFTA

Because of all of this important work, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus as a whole passed a resolution against CAFTA. Ultimately, CAFTA ended up being the closest vote on a trade agreement in U.S. history (we lost by just 1 vote!).

Next Up: the U.S.-Peru and U.S.-Colombia "free trade" agreements

The next fight has already begun over the Peru and Colombia "free trade" agreements. The Bush Administration is at it again, threatening the end of ATPDEA trade preferences if Peru and Colombia don't sign up for the same NAFTA expansion that already stretches as far south as Central America -- no matter what the cost to the region or its workers. But already LULAC and LCLAA have passed new and even more powerful resolution agains the U.S.-Peru and and U.S.-Colombia Free Trade Agreements.

Read LULAC's new resolution on the Peru and Colombia FTAs

Here's what you can do to help generate more resolutions:

Do you know progressive Peruvian or Colombian immigrants who are members of local, hometown associations? Or a service organization that works with immigrants from the Andean Region? Are you yourself a member of or staff for a group like this? Show with your friends and colleagues the new LULAC resolution suggest passing a resolution and send letters of opposition to the U.S. Congress. It is especially important right now to lobby members of Congress who are in the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, urging the CHC to take another strong stand for FAIR TRADE.

Have questions about the facts or need help drafting a resolution?
Fill out the form below and our staff will assist you in the process.

August 28, 2016


We will add your signature from the information you provide.

Add me to the following list(s):
TW Fair Trade International trade/globalization

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.

Organizational Resolutions, Letters and Statements