Tell eBay to Remove Forced Arbitration from Its Terms of Service or at Least Allow Users to Opt Out Online
EBay’s new terms of service would be laughable if they weren’t so outrageous.
To buy or sell something on eBay (a popular online auction site), users need only point and click.
But if eBay users want to protect their constitutional rights by opting out of a forced arbitration clause and ban on consumers joining together in class actions in the user agreement … that’s quite a bit more complicated.
According to eBay’s new terms, users may opt out of these provisions — BUT, in order to do so, eBay requires users to print and mail a signed letter to an agent in Utah.
There is really no reason why users shouldn’t be able to opt out by clicking a button – just like everything else they do on eBay’s website. To ask for snail mail is absurd.
Add your name below to tell eBay: Don’t deny your customers’ rights, and don’t hide behind a bogus offline opt-out.
We, the undersigned, call on eBay to remove from its terms of service the forced arbitration clause and the ban on joining together in a class action. EBay customers should not be required to sacrifice their legal rights. If eBay refuses to remove these terms, the company should at least provide an online opt-out option.
DEADLINE: EBay's terms require current users to opt out by Nov. 9, 2012. New users have 30 days from the day they sign on to eBay's terms.
The only way to opt out of eBay’s forced arbitration provision is by mailing eBay a signed letter that includes specific information. We’ve prepared a sample letter for eBay customers who want to opt out.
Here’s what to do:
1. download the sample letter as a PDF (move your cursor over each box to see what information to enter) or Word file (edit as indicated)
2. print it
3. sign it (It must be signed!)
4. make a copy to keep for your records
5. mail your signed letter to:
eBay Inc.
c/o National Registered Agents, Inc.
2778 W. Shady Bend Lane
Lehi, UT 84043
(This suggestion is not intended as legal advice.)
A forced arbitration clause means that if you ever have a dispute with the company, you can’t go to a public court. You’ll have to go to a private, secretive tribunal chosen by eBay.
The class action ban means that you can’t band together with other customers to make pursuing claims worthwhile. If eBay rips off every user by a few dollars, that would mean millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains with no accountability.
This petition is no longer active.
1-25
of 4893 signatures
Number
Date
Name
Add a Comment
4893
Fri Dec 28 11:48:14 EST 2012
Caitlin Reynolds
4892
Thu Dec 20 21:57:44 EST 2012
Anonymous
4891
Thu Dec 20 03:27:26 EST 2012
DIANE HAHN
4890
Wed Dec 19 21:54:47 EST 2012
Thomas Neill
4889
Thu Dec 13 17:28:05 EST 2012
Kathleen Barnes
4888
Wed Dec 12 13:33:30 EST 2012
Anonymous
4887
Mon Dec 10 16:05:45 EST 2012
Patricia Susan Padilla
4886
Fri Dec 07 23:18:20 EST 2012
Gary Clark
4885
Fri Dec 07 17:41:07 EST 2012
John Peterkin
4884
Fri Dec 07 16:00:51 EST 2012
Donald Proud
4883
Tue Dec 04 05:28:44 EST 2012
susan navidad
4882
Sun Dec 02 17:23:57 EST 2012
Irene Radke
4881
Sun Dec 02 00:04:28 EST 2012
lauri smith
4880
Sat Dec 01 21:26:34 EST 2012
Tony Lam
4879
Sat Dec 01 19:14:53 EST 2012
jace cavacini
Yeah, i just got ripped off by both a buyer for shipping on an item that was exactly as described and by ebay for the fees because they don't have any accountability nor do they require any accountability More....of the buyers. Do NOT SELL on ebay.
4878
Sat Dec 01 01:54:32 EST 2012
Harry Baker
Give it up eBay! No forced arbitration!
4877
Sat Dec 01 00:27:39 EST 2012
Anonymous
4876
Fri Nov 30 15:03:31 EST 2012
marjon riekerk
4875
Thu Nov 29 13:59:04 EST 2012
Anonymous
I do not with to give up Article Seven of the Constitution
4874
Thu Nov 29 13:58:55 EST 2012
Anonymous
I do not with to give up Article Seven of the Constitution
4873
Thu Nov 29 13:58:54 EST 2012
Anonymous
I do not with to give up Article Seven of the Constitution
4872
Thu Nov 29 13:58:44 EST 2012
Anonymous
I do not with to give up Article Seven of the Constitution
4871
Thu Nov 29 13:58:34 EST 2012
Anonymous
I do not with to give up Article Seven of the Constitution
Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation
Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.
Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.
You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.
To become a member of Public Citizen, click here. To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.