Tell eBay to Remove Forced Arbitration from Its Terms of Service or at Least Allow Users to Opt Out Online
EBay’s new terms of service would be laughable if they weren’t so outrageous.
To buy or sell something on eBay (a popular online auction site), users need only point and click.
But if eBay users want to protect their constitutional rights by opting out of a forced arbitration clause and ban on consumers joining together in class actions in the user agreement … that’s quite a bit more complicated.
According to eBay’s new terms, users may opt out of these provisions — BUT, in order to do so, eBay requires users to print and mail a signed letter to an agent in Utah.
There is really no reason why users shouldn’t be able to opt out by clicking a button – just like everything else they do on eBay’s website. To ask for snail mail is absurd.
Add your name below to tell eBay: Don’t deny your customers’ rights, and don’t hide behind a bogus offline opt-out.
We, the undersigned, call on eBay to remove from its terms of service the forced arbitration clause and the ban on joining together in a class action. EBay customers should not be required to sacrifice their legal rights. If eBay refuses to remove these terms, the company should at least provide an online opt-out option.
DEADLINE: EBay's terms require current users to opt out by Nov. 9, 2012. New users have 30 days from the day they sign on to eBay's terms.
The only way to opt out of eBay’s forced arbitration provision is by mailing eBay a signed letter that includes specific information. We’ve prepared a sample letter for eBay customers who want to opt out.
Here’s what to do:
1. download the sample letter as a PDF (move your cursor over each box to see what information to enter) or Word file (edit as indicated)
2. print it
3. sign it (It must be signed!)
4. make a copy to keep for your records
5. mail your signed letter to:
c/o National Registered Agents, Inc.
2778 W. Shady Bend Lane
Lehi, UT 84043
(This suggestion is not intended as legal advice.)
A forced arbitration clause means that if you ever have a dispute with the company, you can’t go to a public court. You’ll have to go to a private, secretive tribunal chosen by eBay.
The class action ban means that you can’t band together with other customers to make pursuing claims worthwhile. If eBay rips off every user by a few dollars, that would mean millions of dollars in ill-gotten gains with no accountability.
This petition is no longer active.
of 4893 signatures
Add a Comment
Mon Nov 05 07:55:05 EST 2012
Emma Spurgin Hussey
Mon Nov 05 00:07:01 EST 2012
Sun Nov 04 19:50:41 EST 2012
Sun Nov 04 14:11:22 EST 2012
Another unnecessary restriction.
Sun Nov 04 12:53:50 EST 2012
Sun Nov 04 12:19:53 EST 2012
There is no reason for such a restrictive policy
Sat Nov 03 14:58:06 EDT 2012
Fri Nov 02 21:03:25 EDT 2012
Fri Nov 02 11:54:03 EDT 2012
Fri Nov 02 03:49:20 EDT 2012
Thu Nov 01 17:55:37 EDT 2012
Thu Nov 01 10:40:38 EDT 2012
Wed Oct 31 21:32:45 EDT 2012
Wed Oct 31 20:36:17 EDT 2012
Wed Oct 31 17:15:32 EDT 2012
I'm OPTING OUT, if it costs me my 14 years on ebay, then so be it.
Wed Oct 31 16:50:35 EDT 2012
Wed Oct 31 10:24:38 EDT 2012
Wed Oct 31 07:51:37 EDT 2012
Tue Oct 30 18:16:45 EDT 2012
Thanks to SCOTUS in 2011 decision: AT&T MOBILITY LLC v. CONCEPCION ET UX
Tue Oct 30 12:12:22 EDT 2012
Tue Oct 30 12:08:38 EDT 2012
Dr. William 'Skip' Dykoski
Don't be yet another large corporation that is a pariah on us.
Tue Oct 30 10:32:43 EDT 2012
mark b. rankin
Tue Oct 30 09:24:03 EDT 2012
Poor customer relations, might want to try keeping your customers. There are other fish in the sea.
Mon Oct 29 20:48:20 EDT 2012
I've been using eBay for 12 years. I think I deserve more respect than eBay is giving us!
Mon Oct 29 20:48:03 EDT 2012
When you remove the consumer protection of things your forced arbitation clause cover, we realize it is in your best interest. The question is, why? What it makes me think of? Why do you need to remove More....it in the first place, you are that worried you will get hit for something you are already doing? Are you really trustworthy? Should I find a different avenue for my business? One that I do not have to worry about being a party to something illegal or immoral?
Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation
Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.
Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.
You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.
To become a member of Public Citizen, click here. To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.