Stand up to Chuck: Demand that Charles Schwab Corporation Stop Denying Its Customers' Rights

Call on the Charles Schwab to Drop the Forced Arbitration Clause and Class-Action Ban from Its Terms

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. — a well-known investment advisor holding more than $2 trillion in assets for millions of investors — is trying to eviscerate its customers’ rights.

In the fine print of Schwab’s terms of service, there’s a forced arbitration clause and a ban on consumers joining together in class actions.

Sign the petition to tell Charles Schwab that nobody should have to sacrifice their rights in order to save for retirement.

Petition to Charles Schwab Corporation:


We, the undersigned, call on Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. to remove from its terms for investors the forced arbitration clause and the ban on joining together in class actions. Schwab should honor its customers’ rights and end its shameful fight against the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

A parody of Charles Schwab's logo that says Stand Up to Chuck

Spread the Word

share on Facebook

What Do These Stealth Provisions Do?


The forced arbitration clause means that if you ever have a dispute with the company, you can’t go to a public court. You’ll have to go to a private, secretive tribunal chosen for you by Charles Schwab.

Class-action bans prevent you from banding together with other customers to hold these firms accountable for deceptive, fraudulent and illegal practices. So if Schwab misled investors and caused them to lose their hard-earned savings, only those few with the time and resources to seek justice individually – in costly and secret arbitration that is stacked against them – stand a chance to recover their losses. Meanwhile, Schwab can escape real accountability for potential bad actions.

This petition is no longer active.
126-150 of 17561 signatures
Number Date Name Add a Comment
17436 Wed May 08 13:34:13 EDT 2013 H GRAY
17435 Wed May 08 07:33:14 EDT 2013 David and Susanne S Arbiter
17434 Wed May 08 06:59:23 EDT 2013 Cynthia Walker
17433 Tue May 07 21:25:29 EDT 2013 Ada C Shaum
17432 Tue May 07 21:20:47 EDT 2013 Sigrid Asmus 201 -->200Why invest with Schwab if the company refuses to accept the provisions of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority? Backing away from customer protection clearly makes Schwab an untrustworthy firm.
17431 Tue May 07 21:03:09 EDT 2013 Richard Arroyo
17430 Tue May 07 18:51:56 EDT 2013 Vince
17429 Tue May 07 17:41:43 EDT 2013 M. Browning Please don't make me close my PCRA account!!!
17428 Tue May 07 17:22:46 EDT 2013 Anonymous These clauses are anti-democratic!
17427 Tue May 07 15:19:29 EDT 2013 George Seman
17426 Tue May 07 10:15:46 EDT 2013 M. Nichols
17425 Tue May 07 09:39:42 EDT 2013 Linda Servey
17424 Tue May 07 04:33:47 EDT 2013 Melinda K Morse
17423 Tue May 07 04:15:25 EDT 2013 Anonymous
17422 Tue May 07 02:08:56 EDT 2013 Erin Brandon
17421 Mon May 06 22:04:03 EDT 2013 k danowski
17420 Mon May 06 21:22:05 EDT 2013 Pauline Thomas-Brown
17419 Mon May 06 20:42:28 EDT 2013 Kerala Rush
17418 Mon May 06 19:57:19 EDT 2013 Nancy Chernett
17417 Mon May 06 18:27:00 EDT 2013 reita NEWKIRK
17416 Mon May 06 16:15:32 EDT 2013 Beverly Linton
17415 Mon May 06 15:35:45 EDT 2013 Lynne Banta
17414 Mon May 06 14:31:57 EDT 2013 Dennis Young
17413 Mon May 06 14:16:26 EDT 2013 walter moore
17412 Mon May 06 12:22:54 EDT 2013 john krumae
<- Prev Next ->

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.