Stand up to Chuck: Demand that Charles Schwab Corporation Stop Denying Its Customers' Rights

Call on the Charles Schwab to Drop the Forced Arbitration Clause and Class-Action Ban from Its Terms

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. — a well-known investment advisor holding more than $2 trillion in assets for millions of investors — is trying to eviscerate its customers’ rights.

In the fine print of Schwab’s terms of service, there’s a forced arbitration clause and a ban on consumers joining together in class actions.

Sign the petition to tell Charles Schwab that nobody should have to sacrifice their rights in order to save for retirement.

Petition to Charles Schwab Corporation:

 

We, the undersigned, call on Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. to remove from its terms for investors the forced arbitration clause and the ban on joining together in class actions. Schwab should honor its customers’ rights and end its shameful fight against the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

A parody of Charles Schwab's logo that says Stand Up to Chuck

Spread the Word


share on Facebook

What Do These Stealth Provisions Do?

 

The forced arbitration clause means that if you ever have a dispute with the company, you can’t go to a public court. You’ll have to go to a private, secretive tribunal chosen for you by Charles Schwab.

Class-action bans prevent you from banding together with other customers to hold these firms accountable for deceptive, fraudulent and illegal practices. So if Schwab misled investors and caused them to lose their hard-earned savings, only those few with the time and resources to seek justice individually – in costly and secret arbitration that is stacked against them – stand a chance to recover their losses. Meanwhile, Schwab can escape real accountability for potential bad actions.


This petition is no longer active.
251-275 of 17561 signatures
Number Date Name Add a Comment
17311 Wed May 01 22:11:37 EDT 2013 Lisa Holm
17310 Wed May 01 22:01:40 EDT 2013 Rebecca Newman
17309 Wed May 01 21:33:30 EDT 2013 Royal Graves And I had been thinking of opening an account; not anymore.
17308 Wed May 01 21:23:25 EDT 2013 Andrea Ivey
17307 Wed May 01 21:16:37 EDT 2013 Karen Frame
17306 Wed May 01 21:14:33 EDT 2013 Michael Ward
17305 Wed May 01 20:35:02 EDT 2013 Sara Holmes
17304 Wed May 01 20:26:46 EDT 2013 parinaz Razghandi
17303 Wed May 01 20:03:01 EDT 2013 Peter Brazitis
17302 Wed May 01 19:01:50 EDT 2013 Jean Lingelbach
17301 Wed May 01 18:56:19 EDT 2013 Nicole De Nardis
17300 Wed May 01 18:22:15 EDT 2013 Anonymous
17299 Wed May 01 18:20:49 EDT 2013 Roger Lilly
17298 Wed May 01 16:36:44 EDT 2013 Keshava Murthy Dear Charles Schwab:

Stop being investors' enemy. I do a lot of business with you. Do you want me to elsewhere?

Keshava S Murthy
17297 Wed May 01 16:17:43 EDT 2013 Ianto Anglesey Forced arbitration is NOT in a customer's best interests.
17296 Wed May 01 16:12:59 EDT 2013 Travis Logan WE ARE THE 99%!!!
17295 Wed May 01 16:04:30 EDT 2013 Michael Holtz
17294 Wed May 01 15:37:02 EDT 2013 Dennis haraszko
17293 Wed May 01 15:23:40 EDT 2013 Dr William M Smith Jr A one-word alternative solution: BOYCOTT!
17292 Wed May 01 15:04:13 EDT 2013 George Radke
17291 Wed May 01 14:36:14 EDT 2013 Anonymous
17290 Wed May 01 14:30:43 EDT 2013 Simon Shapiro
17289 Wed May 01 14:16:51 EDT 2013 Anonymous
17288 Wed May 01 14:16:35 EDT 2013 Sima Cooperman
17287 Wed May 01 14:03:58 EDT 2013 Susan dixon
<- Prev Next ->

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.