Globalization and Trade

» Alternatives To Corporate Globalization

» Democracy, Sovereignty and Federalism

» Deregulation and Access to Services

» Import Safety, Environment and Health

» Jobs, Wages and Economic Outcomes

» NAFTA, WTO, Other Trade Pacts

» Other Issues

Trade Data Center

Trade Data Center

Searchable trade databases, case lists & more

Eyes on Trade blog

Eyes on Trade

Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch blog on globalization and trade

Sign the Petition Opposing Investor-State Dispute Settlement in Trade Agreements

Add Your Name if You Oppose Allowing Foreign Corporations to Sue Governments Over Public Interest Laws They Claim Limit Their Profits

Multinational corporations are scheming for new rights to sue governments — in clandestine, foreign tribunals — demanding taxpayer compensation for profits they allegedly lose over health and safety, environmental, financial and worker protections we all rely on.

This assault on common sense is one of the worst components of so-called “free trade” agreements — like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement and others — that are being negotiated behind our backs. Its technical-sounding name, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, masks an incredibly insidious corporate power-grab.

Join us in calling on governments to reject Investor-State Dispute Settlement in any current or future trade agreements.

Petition to Reject Investor-State Dispute Settlement:

We call on the U.S. government to exclude Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) from any trade agreements, including the Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA or TTIP) and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). These controversial ISDS provisions threaten democracy and limit governments’ ability to regulate in the public interest by empowering corporations to sue nations for unlimited taxpayer compensation in secret, foreign tribunals for a public interest policy or government action that they perceive undermines their "expected future profits."


Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.