Stop the Financial Industry’s Stealth Attack on Our Rights

Urge the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to Stand Up to Wall Street and Defend Consumer Rights

 

A stealth attack on consumer rights is under way.

Big Banks and powerful financial institutions are using the fine print in the terms for checking accounts, credit cards, prepaid cards, student loans and other financial products to deny ripped-off consumers their constitutional right to hold the banks accountable in court.

The federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has the authority to restore our rights by banning these predatory terms.

Tell the CFPB: Stop the stealth attack on our rights and ban forced arbitration now!

 

We, the undersigned, call on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to prohibit forced arbitration in the terms of service of all consumer financial products and services under its jurisdiction. Stand up for consumers and restore our right to hold banks accountable when they break the law.

Video: Marching Band vs. Forced Arbitration


 
 

Spread The Word


share on Facebook


Learn More



Join Our Social Networks



1-25 of 28032 signatures
Number Date Name Comment (optional)
28032 3 months ago erin yarrobino
28031 8 months ago candace persad CAN SEEM DO ANYTHING OR GET SERVICES WITHOUT FORCED ARBITRATION, CONSUMERS HAVE NO RIGHTS
28030 8 months ago Mfuesse SimbaMfuesseS On january 6,2017 Lobel Financial Inc. Repossess withOut notice my vehicle. Contract start in mars 2015 after review my payment history sent by them, I Found one payment missing pay by my Bank Of an...
28029 8 months ago Lori
28028 8 months ago Ashley
28027 8 months ago James Martin Forced Arbitration is wrong. ANY company requiring me to give up my rights in advance is not worth doing business with.
28026 9 months ago Danielle Manning After suffering from acknowledged abuse from my employer and having evidence to support my suit, the AAA Arbitrator disregarded all of it and allowed Tenet Healthcare corporate attorney to verbally ...
28025 9 months ago JeanAnn Hurst
28024 9 months ago Jonathan Brier The forcing of arbitration in terms of service is a backhanded approach to protect the company while ignoring the consumers who at times have no other choice but to use a service or would be missing...
28023 9 months ago Brandy Barber
28022 9 months ago Suzanne Hurley
28021 9 months ago Jason Fourier
28020 9 months ago Blake Hutchison
28019 9 months ago Nancy Breuhaus I know that Bank of America did not present any of my factual data into arbitration. All they had was the merchant stating "did not receive merchant". Yet I submitted UPS receipt signed signature s...
28018 9 months ago Kay Reinfried
28017 9 months ago Wilson Michaels I am not a lawyer, but I want to be able to use the law to hold banks accountable when they cheat me. I should always be allowed to choose any legal redress not just arbitration.
28016 9 months ago Barnes
28015 9 months ago Chelsea Vukovich
28014 10 months ago Johnson
28013 10 months ago Donna Sykes
28012 10 months ago John Wildes
28011 10 months ago Mile M Optional arbitration is fine when both sides agree. Forced arbitration is harmful to consumers, no way around it. Since the finance industry is loathe to provide proposed contracts for review at in...
28010 10 months ago Paul
28009 10 months ago Danny Bellet
28008 10 months ago Lara Schwartz
Next ->

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.