What's the Biggest Avoidable Threat to Obama’s Bold Agenda for Change? Expanding NAFTA to Panama and Colombia!

President Obama has a lot on his plate: health care, energy independence, employee free choice. To succeed, he will need Democrats in Congress and the base united behind this agenda.

With all that at stake, why in the world would Obama’s Trade Representative be pushing a quick vote on Bush’s leftover NAFTA expansion deal with Panama? This deal is opposed by the base and most congressional Democrats. Its passage would create a glide path for Bush’s outrageous NAFTA expansion with world unionist murder capitol Colombia.

Just last month, Obama’s Trade Representative Ron Kirk announced his team was working “rigorously” to pass Bush’s leftover Panama NAFTA expansion deal. Fifteen years of terrible U.S. trade policy has led to job loss, downward pressure on wages and a flood of unsafe imported food and products.

Instead of more of the same, it’s time bad agreements like NAFTA get renegotiated and future trade deals benefit us, not just big multinational corporations.

Let’s not forget 1993. The last time a new Democratic president took on a leftover Bush trade deal, Clinton’s push to pass NAFTA killed the political unity and wasted the honeymoon momentum needed to pass health care reform. Democrats lost their majority in the next election as labor household turnout plummeted.

With our economy in recession, and so many other progressive priorities pending, the last thing we need is more NAFTAs!

Take Action: Please use the form below to write a letter to Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, telling her that we need to work on replacing the NAFTA model – as promised by President Obama – by renegotiating the Panama FTA.

August 25, 2016


We will add your signature from the information you provide.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.
Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.